• Anna's DayBreak News
  • Posts
  • Poll Results and Comments : Ukraine Peace Talks Gain Momentum, Gaza Ceasefire Deal and The Most Synthetic Life Form

Poll Results and Comments : Ukraine Peace Talks Gain Momentum, Gaza Ceasefire Deal and The Most Synthetic Life Form

Anna's Daybreak News

Just facts, you think for yourself

Do you believe U.S. security guarantees coordinated with European countries are sufficient to ensure Ukraine’s long-term peace?


  • 62% No, Ukraine needs stronger international commitments
  • 27% Yes, they provide enough protection
  • 11% Unsure

EmailComments
robs...Once Putin resumes his takeover of Ukraine for a 3rd time whenever Democrats resume control of the U.S. Presidency, I fear that the European Peace Keeping forces will simply retreat (will European soldiers really die for a corrupt Ukraine?!), and a call for U.S. troops on the ground would become imminent. I pray this doesn't coincide with a coordinated China invasion of Taiwan before the U.S. has re-built its Navy and overhauled its drone warfare capability.
mdul...The US had made security guarantees to enable the Ukrainian disarmament of its nuclear weapons, those guarantees captured in the Budapest Memorandum. However, the US failed to honor them and recall Trump even telling Russia to go ahead and press their attack as they wished. It's a comforting thought that appeasement could lead to stability but it's been proven a mirage before and will do so again. Russia, or the Soviet Union in its day, is intent on capturing land and expanding its control. Here is a partial list beginning just with the end of WWI. • 1920: Poland – Soviet invasion in the Polish-Soviet War. • 1939: Poland – invaded eastern Poland in coordination with Nazi Germany after the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. • 1939–1940: Finland – Winter War, USSR invaded Finland. • 1940: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania – annexed and occupied. • 1940: Romania – seized Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina. • 1941: Iran – jointly invaded with Britain to secure oil fields and supply lines. • 1945: Germany (East Prussia, Berlin) – Red Army invaded Nazi Germany. • 1945: Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Manchuria (China), Korea (North) – Soviet invasions at the end of WWII. • 1956: Hungary – crushed Hungarian Revolution with invasion. • 1968: Czechoslovakia – invaded during Prague Spring. • 1979–1989: Afghanistan – invaded to support communist government. • 1991–1993: Moldova (Transnistria) – Russian troops intervened in conflict and remain stationed. • 1994–1996, 1999–2009: Chechnya – not a foreign country, but Russia invaded to suppress independence. • 2008: Georgia – invaded South Ossetia and Abkhazia during Russo-Georgian War. • 2014: Ukraine – annexed Crimea and backed separatists in Donbas. • 2015–present: Syria – military intervention in Syrian Civil War (requested by Assad, so technically not an invasion, but major involvement). • 2022–present: Ukraine – full-scale invasion. Summary: From 1900 onward, Russia/USSR invaded or directly attacked at least 18 different countries/territories, including Poland, Finland, Baltic states, Romania, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Russia will not be appeased and satisfied with some portion of Ukraine. Additionally, those people arguing against a strong stance now normally include some warning about escalation to a higher level of engagement, like the war becoming nuclear. Even with full US security guarantees (already proven ineffective), what will be different when Russia invades again? Less fear of escalation? Giving up territory now is just a way for people to hope that it will be sufficient but it will not. One more point in this lengthy reply. If some foreign power succeeded in attacking the US and through a rapid advance managed to take over Texas, would be ever consider giving up land for peace? Not a chance and we would view ourselves as the aggrieved but resolute defenders of right over wrong.
yevh...Ukraine already has US and Europe's security guarantees in a form of Budapest memorandum, which Trump wiped himself with.
atli...The US has proven that it is willing to break, or refuse to honor, any treaty promise that it has made in the past that does not meet its own needs over that of other treaty participants. Why would anyone want to trust the US? European countries are more honest treaty participants but seldom negotiate saner treaties. It is unfortunate that Mahatmas Gandhi or Marshall Rosenberg are no longer with us.
john...Ukraine should not trust Trump
jald...Why is it our responsibility to provide security assurances for another country? This is ridiculous if Ukraine can’t stand on its own then that is their problem.
usct...No one should trust Putin.
ljar...Can't trust verbal agreements, especially nothing out of Trump's mouth. As he has proven, changes in leadership of countries can negate past promises. Put in absolutely cannot be trusted.
mich...Putin will continue to harrass and attack Ukraine. That is how he is wired and this has been humiliating for him. Trump is a sucker for him. It has been entertaining watching him get played by Putin
rrpa...Neither Putin or Trump can be trusted
vtgr...They should become members of NATO
milt...It depends on the details and commitments. Putin has said he will not accept a NATO style guarantee. But that seems to be exactly what’s being discussed. However, there’s also still a high risk that they will never agree on the land swap details.
nrpe...No, support could again come too little, too late again. Ukraine had security deals when the Soviet Union collapsed and you can see what happened now.
ambl...I don't see the US being sufficiently committed to peace and fear the European countries will be stuck with the majority of responsibility.
jlcg...It depends: how do you define long term who is elected 48th president of the United Sates, and then 49yh and 50th, and so on will Poutine survive Trump or the reverse how much will China pays to buy Crimea how will Artificial Intelligence be translated into Yddish
jonh...The EU should state that if Russia attacks Ukraine in the future, Ukraine will be granted immediate acceptance into NATO and will be defended by NATO.
jdka...After russias aggression, Ukraine should be admitted to nato. That would ensure failure of Russias expansion policies.
nanc...Can’t trust Trump or Putin to keep their promises and their should be no deal without a ceasefire.
robe...It should especially if we hold all parties to established commitments and agreements.
lora...Yes, these will work. If they do not work is that the Europeans and US do not follow through. It was the same when Biden opened our borders and did not follow the law against illegal immigration.
koad...President Trump, the master negotiator, knows what he is doing.
lmca...Bring Ukraine into NATO.
mspe...Trump has played into the hands of Putin, the absolute aggressor in this war. He is no friend of Ukraine and a Putin Puppet, writ hard on destroying our democracy and the Ukraine's.
donm...Putin is not going to cede any illegally acquired territory in this confrontation. It will require a very united front from the US and EU to have him back away. Putin whole concept of NATO is rather silly. When is the last time NATO invaded another country? Rather rhetorical, however, no one is asking the question.
twin...Dont trust putin! He continues bombing civilian sites daily and is a shady dealer!
mrse...What are the security guarantees? Will they be NATO style with troops from multiple countries in Ukraine?
dcro...You cannot believe any guarantee made by the US under Donald Trump. It is imperative thet European countries particpate, as they have a distinct interest in the safety and security of Ukraine. i
theg...The US already provided territorial guarantees to Ukraine in the past in exchange for them giving up their nuclear weapons. We did not enforce the guarantee when Russia first began incursions into Ukrainian territory. Why do we believe that will work now?
mark...Any agreement involving Putin is not a guarantee.
chri...Any U.S. security guarantees made while Donald Trump, or anyone associated wth him in any way, is Commander-in-Chief are worth even less than the Munich Agreement signed by Neville Chamberlain on September 30, 1938.
chri...What deal from Trump can ever be trusted?? Everyone knows the answer.
nasm...No one can rely on Trump or his administration.
sara...Puting is a liar bent on reconquest of Eastern Europe - his government cannot be trusted in any way. Unless there are specific an immediate triggers for delineated actions he will go back to aggressing in short order, and the international community will dither and let him advance as they have done so far in Ukraine.
moir...I do not favor rewarding Russia for invading Ukraine. Russia is not a friend of the West and we should not treat them as such.

How do you view India’s decision to strengthen ties with Russia and China while distancing itself from the U.S. amid trade tensions?


  • 56% A risky diplomatic shift
  • 37% A necessary strategic move
  • 7% Unsure

EmailComments
chri...Smart for India. Bad for US. Trump induced this.
sopa...Trump's tariffs are on american people. It's the road to american poverty
atli...As the US loses respect around the world due to arbitrary tariffs and other irrational policies I suspect that this is just the beginning of the well earned isolation of the US.
nanc...Trump wants to call all the shots and thinks everyone will do his bidding, but he’s in way over his head. There’s a big world out there that is ready to function (and thrive) without the U.S. Once the leader, now turning into a banana republic.
mdul...Trump's work to Make China Great Again continues to succeed beyond even his own understanding. China has filled the void left by Trump's withdrawal of US influence all around the world. Since Trump started his trade war, China has signed at least 53 free trade deals to bypass the US. Further strengthening the ties between India, China, and Russia was, and remains, the clear outcome of US disengagement. As frightening as that would have been on its own, combining it with Trump's efforts to alienate all of its historic partners is leaving the US isolated and weaker. India would have certainly preferred being able to thread a line between solely committing to either side but Trump's action removed that possibility and they had to choose who was the best partner at this time for India.
ebr....Good for India. Wouldn't be interested in continuing relations with the US right now either.
lora...This is a necessary for India which most of their people live in poverty. The smart Indians and Indians with money are leaving their country. Modi needs to go, he has done nothing for the India people as he accumulates more and more weatlh.
milt...The U.S. is becoming and erratic partner on many levels. I expected India to continue this track, as I’m sure other countries are as well.
vtgr...The exorbitant tariff drove them into the arms of Russia and China
sara...No country can trust that the US under Trump or Russia under Putin will be true to any commitments. At least China is playing the long game and holds to the promises it makes.
arth...The obvious US move is to strengthen ties with India’s main adversary Pakistan. However, for the U.S. and India, to move toward better relations with China and Pakistan, is like petting the head of a rabid dog.
mrse...Unfortunate for us
jald...If that is the game India wants to play the stop importing all these Indians on H1B1 and stop letting them into our universities. We need to smarten up as a country real quick.
cica...No Sovereign nation is gonna take Trump’s shit sitting down. Virtually every nation out there, including our former closest allies or making moves to trade around the United States wherever they can. They’ll continue to trade up with us, because we’re a huge market, but they’re showing up their own flanks at our expense

Do you think government investment in private companies like Intel is an effective way to boost domestic technology industries?


  • 68% No, it distorts the market
  • 26% Yes, it provides crucial support
  • 7% Unsure

EmailComments
mdul...It is so funny to think of the contortions MAGA needs to do to support this move. MAGA used to at least have their roots in small government staying out of our lives and taking action only in line with what the Constitution said the federal government is supposed to do. However, after all of the other incursions to push federal government into every aspect of our lives, now Trump also wants to take the US even closer to the Russian and Chinese forms of government where government owns and directs much of the industry. We have been told to be cautious of any Chinese technology and products because of national security concerns. Will MAGA now be surprised when China begins refusing to allow the sale of Intel chips to their ecosystem?
jald...I can understand tha thinking that if the government is going to give you billions then the taxpayers need something in return but I still do t like the government coming in to rescue companies.
sopa...It's a socialist move. It's the road to american poverty.
lora...It is time the US starts standing up against China for stealing patents and intellect new discoveries.
milt...And the history of it working is poor.

How effective do you think a 60-day truce is for paving the way toward lasting peace?


  • 62% It’s too short and unlikely to lead to durable peace
  • 38% It’s a meaningful first step toward permanent peace

EmailComments
lora...Israel should not release anymore hostages until the war is over. We need to let Hamas that there is no more negotiations. Israel should just wipe out Hamas and then rebuild Gaza.
bria...Hamas must be defeated to have lasting peace
nmik...Will need to be followed up quickly with meaningful action like food directly given to Gazans not Hamas. Gazans are the key as Muslim radicals lie and cant be held to their word.
pete...As long as Netanyahu remains PM, Israel is not looking for long term peace.
atli...The only solution to long term peace is for the US to stop arming Israel and honor the UN resolutions related to genocide.

Which approach do you think is more promising for chronic inflammatory diseases like psoriasis?


  • 93% Targeting immune cell metabolism (new approach)
  • 7% Targeting immune cell surface receptors (traditional methods)

EmailComments
nanc...Psoriasis has been such a problem for so many. It’s a promising sign!
ebr....Keep pushing forward. Happy to see new developments!

How do you feel about the ethical implications of creating synthetic life with redesigned genetic codes?


  • 69% It raises serious ethical concerns regardless of oversight
  • 31% It’s ethically acceptable with proper oversight

EmailComments